Obsessing about rope
Scott Bradner
Many
years ago, long enough ago that I do not remember who, where, why or when,
someone told me that the lower ropes on clipper ships were left twisted whereas
the running rope and much of the other rope was right twisted. Since this was long before I was
involved in ship modeling, I am puzzled as to what the context might have been
for someone to tell me that. In
any case, that factoid stuck with me in the background through the years and
popped to the foreground when I started work on a model of the Donald McKay
clipper ship Flying Cloud and it set me on a quest to find out just what
the story was. This article is the
result of that quest.
Rope is not a new
concept
First of all, rope is far from a new concept. Figure 1 is of a coil of rope made from papyrus fibers from about 3,800 years ago that was found in an Egyptian cave. This rope was likely made for rigging Egyptian river boats. It looks just like the rope we use today.
Figure 1
Sizing rope
For
general background, rope on ships was sized by its circumference. Thus, a 4-inch rope is rope that has a
4Ó circumference (about a 1¼Ó diameter).
Types of rope
LetÕs
start out with a review about the types of rope used on ships back in the day
(where Òthe dayÓ was anywhere from 150 years ago to thousands of years ago). For thousands of years rope has basically
been plant material twisted into yarns, and those yarns twisted into rope. For most of this time there have been
three basic rope designs known (at least in the 1800s) as Òhawser-laid,Ó
Òcable-laid,Ó and Òshroud-laid.Ó See figure 2.
Figure 2
All
of these types of rope start with fine fibers of plant material such as
hemp. These fibers are twisted
together into yarns. Multiple yarns, in turn, are then twisted together to
produce a strand.
Three
strands can be twisted together to produce a hawser-laid rope.
Four
strands can be twisted together to produce a shroud-laid rope but
when you do that you wind up with a void in the middle of the rope, so you have
to fill that void with yet another strand, a strand about half the size of the
other strands.
Four-strand
rope is a special rope that was used
for lanyards and manropes.
Four-strand rope is the same as shroud-laid rope without the center
strand.
Three
or four hawser-laid ropes can be twisted together to produce a cable-laid
rope.
Note,
that the direction of twist reverses at each stage. So, if you twist the fibers together in a clockwise
direction to produce the yarn, you would twist the yarns together in a counterclockwise
direction to make a strand and twist the strands together in a clockwise
direction to produce a rope. You
need to do this so that the tensions in the rope try to hold the rope together
rather than just let it unravel. (See, for example, Ashley[1].)
Twists.
According
to Herbert R. Carter, the number of twists per foot in a rope is inversely
proportional to its circumference and that a 2Ó diameter rope has 8 twists per
foot.[2] This information leads to the following
equation:
T = (6.28/C)*8
Where T is the number of
twists per foot and C is circumference of
the rope. (The value Ò6.28Ó comes from the fact that the circumference of a
rope that is 2Ó in diameter is 6.28Ó).
In researching for this article, I purchased sample lengths of many
different sizes of hemp rope and measured the number of twists per foot in each
of them. I found that the samples
closely matched the results of this equation.
I
have not been able to make scale rope that has as many twists per scale foot as
the equation calls for. The
strands break before they have been twisted enough. But I have achieved 70% or
so of the value or so for a range of scale rope sizes, and I think the result
looks good enough.
The handedness of rope.
Now
a word about the handedness of rope.
Ropes can have a right or left twist, see figure 3.
Figure 3
Most
rope on ships and for other uses has a right twist. The 3,800 year old Egyptian rope in figure 1, has a right
twist, as would any non-braded rope you might buy at the hardware store
tomorrow. That said, it turns out that some hawser-laid rope used on both
warships and clipper ships had a left twist. Cable-laid rope
made from normal right-twist hawser rope would be have a left twist. The big
question is Òwhat rope was used for what purpose on these ships and why chose
that particular rope?Ó
Running rigging
A
lot of the rope on sailing ships was, and is, running rigging that goes through
blocks or is used to tie things down and needs to be flexible. Historically, almost all rope used in
running rigging on large sailing vessels was hawser-laid rope with a right
twist. Apparently, this was
because such rope was strong enough and flexible enough to do the job and last
a reasonable length of time. I say
ÒapparentlyÓ because I have not found any document that specifically says why hawser-laid
rope with a right twist was chosen for running rigging, but I did find a few
references that said that specific ropes, for example cannon breaching rope[3],
and the rope used for the lower and topsail yard braces on clipper ships were
hawser-laid rope with a left twist[4] because, it
was claimed, such rope was Òmore pliable and less likely to kinkÓ[5],
but was not as durable than hawser-laid rope with a right twist.
Note
that most or the ropes in running rigging must be small enough in diameter that
the sailors can grasp it to haul on it and wrap it around a belaying pin, that
means that the largest practical
sized rope for running rigging is about 4.5Ó
(a little less than 1.5Ó in diameter).
Some of the rope in running rigging connects to blocks and is not
handled directly so it can be larger.
The fore and main course sail sheets & tacks are another case where hawser-laid rope with a right twist was not used. These ropes were cable-laid lines that were quite large at the sail end and then were tapered along their length so that they were small enough for sailors to handle and secure to a belaying pin at the far end.[6]
Standing rigging
The
term Òstanding riggingÓ covers shrouds, pendants, stays, backstays, lanyards
and guys as well as ratlines, foot ropes, man ropes and stirrups. The yarn to
be used in making standing rigging was treated with Stockholm Tar[7] during manufacturing[8] before being twisted into strands so that the
resulting rope would be more water resistant and longer lasting. The yarn used to make running rigging
was also tarred but to a much lesser amount.[9]
Cable-laid standing
rigging
I
started this quest to find out what types of rope were used on large sailing
vessels because I had been told at some point that the lower rigging on such
ships had a left twist where normal rope has a right twist. But neither of the most common
reference books on ships rigging (Biddlecombe & Underhill) made any mention
of using cable-laid or left twist rope for standing rigging such as shrouds.
At
some point I noticed that the shrouds and some of the other standing rigging on
some of the ship models in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts and in the U.S. Naval Academy Museum in Annapolis were either
left twisted cable-laid rope or at least were rope with a left twist. See the
figure below:
Figure 2: Shrouds on models in the U.S. Naval Academy Museum
Specifically, there are 35 models in the U.S. Naval Academy Museum that represent large sailing
ships built before the late 1800s and are rigged. The main stays on 32 of them
have a left twist and 14 of these stays are clearly cable-laid, and the shrouds
on 13 of the 35 models have a left twist and some of these shrouds are clearly
cable laid. I was told that many
of the models had restoration work done on their rigging at some point, mostly
by one particular restorer so if that restorer thought that some standing
rigging should have a left twist that could have impacted multiple models. But some of the models, including the St
George and one or more of the prisoner models still have their original
rigging (the silk rigging on the St. George dates from about 1702!) and
these models show cable-laid stays (the St. George and the prisoner
models) and/or shrouds (the prisoner models). Thus, it was clear to me that
there was something that Biddlecombe and Underhill were not mentioning.
Figure 3: Cable-laid stay on the St George
After quite a bit of searching I located David SteelÕs early
works, including the first and second editions of the Art of Rigging, Peter ForgeÕs Tables É, and BradyÕs The
Kedge-Anchor,
all of which detailed the use of cable-laid rope in the standing rigging of
large sailing ships. Now I had proof that what I had been told was accurate and
had a lot of detail on where cable-laid rope was used. Since then, I located additional
references that help fill out additional details.
The research I undertook showed that shrouds, pendants, stays, backstays and guys on large sailing vessels were usually
cable-laid.[10] thus, they had a left twist.
For
example, the figure below shows a shroud and deadeye from the HMS Invincible
which sank in 1758. The rope is
cable-laid with a left twist.
Figure 4: Shroud and deadeye from HMS Invincible
But
why would ship builders decide to use cable-laid rope for the shrouds,
pendants, stays, backstays and guys
on big sailing ships? For very large
shrouds and stays the answer is easy, the rope making processes of the day
could not reliably make hawser-laid rope larger than 9Ó in circumference, due to difficulties in keeping yarn tensions even.[11]
But this is a reasonable question for smaller rope. Those contemporaneous documents that discuss the use of cable-laid rope, point out that cable-laid rope is weaker than hawser-laid, but it seems that the mariners of old thought that cable-laid rope was watertight. For example, see this quote from LuceÕs 1863 Seamanship:
Cable-laid É Rope, É, is left handed rope of nine strands and is so made to render
it impervious to water, but the additional twist necessary to lay it up seems
to detract from the strength of the fibre, the strength of plain laid being to
that of cable-laid as 8.7 to 6; besides this, it stretches considerably under
strain.[12]
It may or not have been the case that
cable-laid rope was more Òimpervious to waterÓ than hawser-laid rope but
the fact that it was a widely assumed feature would lead shipbuilders to use
cable-laid rope for standing rigging, where they did not want to have to
replace it as often as they replaced running rigging rope. The logic seems to have been: if using
cable-laid rope kept the water out maybe the rope would rot less and thus last
longer.
In
any case, cable-laid rope was in common use as late as 1909, as is shown in the
following quote from H.R. Carter:
Ropes
from 1 to 2 ½ inches in circumference are usually hawser-laid, and from
3 to 10 inches either hawser- or cable-laid. Above 10 inches they are always cable-laid.[13]
The conclusion that most if not all of the
shrouds, pendants, stays, backstays and guys on ships like the Flying Cloud were cable-laid is reenforced by the rigging tables
in many references that included the types of rope used on sailing ships around
the time that the Flying Cloud
was active. (See endnote 10.)
As mentioned above, cable-laid rope can be
made of 3 or 4 hawser-laid ropes.
Duncan McLean wrote that the standing rigging on a number of the Donald
McKay clipper ships, built and launched around the time that the Flying
Cloud was launched, was made up of Òfour-stranded patent rope of Russian
hemp[14].Ó I assume McLean meant cable-laid rope
made up of 4 hawser-laid ropes, although it is possible that he might have
meant shroud-laid rope. I think
the letter is unlikely since it would contradict the many references that
insist that most standing rigging was cable-laid, particularly since at least
the lower shrouds and stays were larger than what could be achieved in
hawser-laid rope. In
addition, the routing tables for merchant ships in the early editions of
SteelÕs The Art of Rigging show cabled 4-strand rope for stays,
backstays and shrouds.[15]
Lanyards
Lanyards
used with deadeyes were made of four-stranded, tarred, hawser-laid rope.[16]
Footropes, manropes, Flemish horses and stirrups
Footropes
(old name ÒhorsesÓ) hang below the yards to support sailors working on the
sails, footropes are supported by stirrups if they span a wide enough space,
Flemish horses are short footropes that overlap the base footropes to reach the
ends of the yards, and manropes are strung alongside booms, etc. to provide a
handhold.[17]
I did not find any references that said what type of rope was used for footropes,
stirrups and Flemish horses, so I have assumed that they were tarred
hawser-laid roped with a right twist.
Manropes
were tarred 4-strand rope like lanyards.[18]
Ratlines
Ratlines
were tied across shrouds to enable sailors to reach the yards and upper masts. Ratlines were generally 1 to 1.5 inch
rope and thus, too small to be cabled. I did not find any references that said
what type of rope was used for ratlines, so I have assumed that they were
tarred hawser-laid rope with a right twist.
Worming, parcelling and serving shrouds
Worming
is wrapping a small rope into the spiral groves in a large rope to make the
ropeÕs surface smoother. Parcelling is wrapping strips of canvas around a rope
in a spiral fashion and tarring the result thus sealing in the worming rope. Serving
is tightly winding a small tarred rope around a parcelled rope to create a
barrier to chafing such as by sails.[19]
Figure 5: Worming, parcelling
and serving a rope
Shrouds
are wormed, parcelled and served where they go around a mast.[20]
Also, the full length of the foremost shroud of each set of shrouds is wormed, parcelled
and served to protect it from the rubbing of the sails.[21]
Sizes of deadeyes, lanyards and blocks
Here
is some other rigging-related sizing information I found in my research.
The
diameter of a deadeye is 1.5 times the circumference of the shroud or
other rope that it will be used with.[22] This matches the information in those
rigging tables that include deadeye sizes.
The
size of a lanyard in a deadeye is half the size of the shroud or other rope
that the deadeye will be used with.[23] This
matches the information in those rigging tables that include lanyard sizes.
Blocks
are sized based on the size of the rope that will run through them.
Specifically, the thickness of the sheave in the block is 1.1 times the
diameter of the rope, the diameter of the sheave is 5 times the thickness of
the sheave, the slot for the sheave is the thickness of the sheave plus 1/16Ó,
the length of the block is 8 times the width of the sheave slot, the width of
the block is 6 times the thickness of the sheave, and the thickness of the
block is ½ the length of the block.[24]
Thus, the length of a block (what is often
referred to as the size of the block) can be expressed in the following
equation:
L = ((D * 1.1) + 1/16) * 8
Where L is block length and D is the rope
diameter.
Overall,
single blocks are about ¾ as thick as they are long and half as wide as
they are long. Double and triple
blocks are wider.
For my Flying Cloud model
After all the research, I decided to use
natural color hawser-laid rope with a right twist for all of the running
rigging except for a few yard braces - which will be natural color hawser-laid
rope with a left twist, and the course sheets and the course sheet tacks
– which will be natural color tapered cable-laid with a right twist (if I
can figure out how to make tapered cable-laid rope).
I also decided to use dark brown/black 4-strand
cable-laid rope for the shrouds, stays, backstays and guys; black/brown
4-strand hawser-laid rope for the lanyards, and black/brown 3-strand
hawser-laid rope for the rest of the standing rigging, including foot ropes,
ratlines, etc.
An
earlier version of this article was published in the April 2020 issue of the USSCMSG Broadside.
photo
credits:
figure
1: https://www.bu.edu/cas/magazine/fall10/Egypt/index.shtml
figures
2 & 3: photos by author
figure
4: forgotten source related to the HMS
Invincible
figure 5: https://www.hmsrichmond.org/knots.htm
6/17/2021
[1] AshleyÕs book of Knots, page 23
[2] Herbert R. Carter, Modern Flax, Hemp and Jute Spinning and Twisting, 1907, page 171
[3] Burney – The BoyÕs Manual of Seamanship & Gunnery – 1871 – page 127
[4] Luce, Textbook of Seamanship – 1884 – page 140
[5] Textbook of Seamanship – 1884, pages 22-23
[6] David Steel, The Elements and Practice of Rigging and Seamanship – 1794, page 61, William Brady, The Kedge Anchor – 1852, pages 342 and 350, and Charles Chapman, All About Ships – 1869, pages 301 and 302
[7] Stockholm Tar is a form of pine tar and is blackish-brown in color, not pure black as is often used on ship models. (see here)
[8] David Steel, Art of Rigging – 2nd edition, page 60 and Modern Flax, Hemp É, page 168
[9] The Elements and Practice of Rigging and Seamanship, page 60
[10] Anderson, Rigging of Ships in the Days of the Sprit Topmast, - 1927, page 84, Elements and Practice of Rigging and Seamanship , page 61, and the tables in Force, Tables É, Steel, Art of Rigging 1st and 2nd edition, etc.
[11] Damien Sanders, The Cables and Cablets of the Mary Rose (1545) – 2019, page 52
[12] Luce, Seamanship – 1863, pages 49-50, see also Henderson, Seamanship – 1907, page 90, AshleyÕs Book of Knots, page 23, and Nares, Seamanship 1871, page 122
[13] H. R. Carter, Rope, Twine, and Thread Making – 1909, page 69
[14] See Duncan McLean articles on the Bald Eagle, Empress of the Sea, Flying Fish, Lightning, and Stag Hound.
[15] See, e.g., Steel, The Art of Rigging 1st edition and Steel, The Art of Rigging 2nd edition
[16] Brady, The Kedge Anchor – rigging tables (e.g., page 342), see also, AshleyÕs book of Knots, pages 23 and 537
[17] AshleyÕs book of Knots, pages 550, 600 and 601
[18] AshleyÕs book of Knots, page 23
[19] Textbook of Seamanship, pages 47 & 48, see also Steel The Art of Rigging 2nd edition pages 35, 38-&39, and 48 & 49.
[20] Textbook of Seamanship, pages 39 & 40
[21] Textbook of Seamanship, page 100
[22] Ainsley, The Examiner in Seamanship – 1864, page 10. See also, G. S. Nares Seamanship – 1868 page 57
[23] AshleyÕs Book of Knots, page 537. See also, Nares Seamanship - 1868 page 57 and The Examiner in Seamanship, page 10
[24]
The Elements and Practice of Rigging And
Seamanship, page 153