This story appeared on Network World at http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2008/072208bradner.html
SCO
Group: Its future is all used up
Far too slowly, software company is slipping away
'Net Insider By Scott Bradner ,
Network World , 07/22/2008
The SCO Group got bad news in
court last week. Not an unusual event for this company, but I wish the need for
such events would finally go away for good.
I've
now been writing about SCO for five years -- how time does fly when you have
someone to despise. In my first column about SCO's
decision go into the lawsuit business rather than having to do all the hard
work of making a product that someone might want to buy, I thought that someone
would just buy the slime off. I was wrong -- I guess there is some truth to the
punch line of the old joke that "there are just some things a lawyer won't
do." I guess IBM's lawyers could not stomach
the idea of rewarding such repulsive behavior.
Just
to be clear, it is not inherently repulsive to sue if your intellectual
property has been infringed on. There are perfectly legitimate cases where
someone in business finds out that someone else is using technology that they
have patents or copyrights on. Things get uglier when the group suing is not trying
to do anything with the technology other than sue. But what SCO tried to do is
indeed repulsive -- not the part about suing IBM for lots of money, but the
part about attempting to wipe out open source software for a buck. Claiming
that anyone using Linux was violating SCO's copyright and not telling anyone
what the violations were so they could be corrected (in the end, SCO puked up a
hairball of accusations that would not choke a mouse) -- that was repulsive.
The
latest news on SCO was generally predictable from the last court decision that
gave SCO the bad news (for them anyway) that the basic underpinning of its suit
against IBM (and charge against Linux) was faulty: SCO did not happen
to own the copyrights it was suing over. The same judge has now ruled that SCO
owes Novell $2.5 million for some
software licenses.
SCO
is already in bankruptcy, but its leadership (if that's the right term) is
still dreaming of somehow reaping big bucks though the court system (See Groklaw's detailed and careful
coverage of this sordid tail for much more information.) Maybe it is those
dreams of undeserved, and now unlikely, riches that keep them going, but I sure
wish SCO would just finish fading away.
When
I read Groklaw's report on the latest court decision I was reminded of a scene
from the movie "A
Touch of Evil." (If you have not seen it, this is
perhaps the best film-noir crime movie, assuming you see the 1998 recut
version.) Yes, the movie title is more than a bit appropriate for SCO, but the
scene that came to mind is the one in which Orson Welles walks into a
whorehouse and asks Marlene Dietrich to read his future:
Welles: Read my future for me.
Dietrich: You haven't got any.
Welles: Hmm? What do you
mean?
Dietrich: Your future's all used up.
SCO's
future is all used up, too. When will the company finally realize this and stop
being a news topic?
Disclaimer:
Considering Harvard's past, there is a lot of future in the university still,
but the university has not commented on The SCO Group or the movie, so the
above review and wish are mine.
All contents copyright 1995-2009 Network World, Inc. http://www.networkworld.com