The following text is
copyright 2005 by Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction,
as long as attribution is given and this notice is included.
Predicting
with the world in mind
By Scott
Bradner
The editors
asked us columnists to focus our first column of the new year on our
predictions for the future of the corner of IT that we each cover. For me, that would normally entail a
bunch of flip and or sarcastic observations of current corporate technological
assumptions and the technical realities that will stress those assumptions in
the next year or two. But I fund
it hard to be flip in light of the earthquake and
resulting tsunamis in South Asia that ended 2004, but I'll do the best I
can.
My first prediction is that
corporations, at least outwardly, will continue to ignore the world around
them. A quick and decidedly
non-scientific survey of the web sites of a number of the Fortune 500
corporations show that, for most of them, it's business as usual. Only a few web sites, including
Microsoft, Wall Mart and Dell Computer bothered to acknowledge the South Asian
disaster and include links to relief organizations, and only one that I found,
Apple Computer, took almost all business off its home page to focus on how
people can help. On the positive
side I only found one site (ITT) that exploited the events to highlight their
own products (with no link for donations). For what it's worth, I think a corporation that is not a
member of its community is not living up to its responsibilities.
Speaking of the 'Net,
2004 showed the power of the Internet in political (and humanitarian)
fundraising, in political discourse, in corporate and political whistle
blowing, in public investigation (say good by to Dan Rather). This power will only increase this year
and in the years to come.
Corporations that attempt, as some did, to stifle Internet-based
discussions of their failings rather than to focus on fixing them will suffer
the fate of increased focus on the failings. Note to corporate PR people: treat the inevitable YourCompanyNameSucks.com web site as a
resource to hear what your company is doing wrong (so it can be fixed) not as a
target for the legal team.
By some
accounts 2004 was supposed to be the year of enterprise voice over IP (VoIP)
and of storage over IP. Neither
quite took off, and in spite of the fact that in both cases a full range of
products are now available I doubt that 2004 will prove to be the year of
either. I'm sure there will be a
number of additional big, high-profile conversions to VoIP and that storage
over IP (e.g. iSCSI) will represent a recognizable fraction of the market but I
expect it will be a few years before either will be the default path.
Based on
an AOL report maybe 2005 will be a year when spam reduces as an issue (no
thanks to the CAN-SPAM act). It is
possible that 2005 will see the average rate at which Microsoft patches its
software will start to exceed the average rate of new exploits but I'm not
holding my breath.
In any
case, Internet governance efforts, user-hostile mergers, federal and state
regulators, law enforcement demands, open source proliferation, and the forces
of nature and man will ensure that 2005 will not be boring.
disclaimer:
Harvard is closing in on having had 400 chances to make annual predictions but
there has proven to be little science in the effort and the above are mine not
the university's anyway.