The following text is
copyright 2004 by Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction,
as long as attribution is given and this notice is included.
Tattle
tail WebEx
By Scott Bradner
I admit it. When I'm on the phone with a salesdroid
I do not devote my full attention to his or her exhortations of product
greatness. Instead, I tend to read
email, surf the web or maybe even do a little work. Now WebEx wants to make that harder. To me, this is just
another reason to not use WebEx.
The economy must be
picking up -- at least to judge by the number of unsolicited calls I've been
getting from sales people. (Aside:
I still do not know why the do-not-call list does not apply to business as well
as residential phones. How is
interrupting my business day to hear about something that I have no interest in
less disrupting than interrupting me watching the evening news?)
Each of these salespeople
seems to think, or at least is trained to pretend to think that whatever they
are selling is indispensable to me or to Harvard. Most of them have very little idea of the details of the
product they have been hired to sell.
This is made very clear the first time I ask any substantive
question. One example from last
week was 'just where do you install this magic box in the network?' The sales person did not know but
wanted to set me up with a evaluation system anyway and
was miffed when I said ten minutes into the first call seemed to be a bit early
in the process to be talking about evaluation systems.
I do <ITAL try
/ITAL> to be nice, even though that is frequently very hard -- trying to
talk about things like network security appliances with a salesdroid that
probably has to be reminded to plug in his computer can be a bit
frustrating -- from time to time I
admit that I get rather direct about the lack of information transfer.
In the 10% of the cases
where the sales person actually seems to have a clue or something on the
company web site overrides the clue-deflector shields protecting the sales
person I agree to have a follow up call with one or more people that are
supposed to actually know the product.
Most of these are just conference calls -- the regular kind where the
equipment locks everyone out when someone is talking so there is almost no way
to break into the sales pitch with a question -- where they send a set of
slides beforehand. Some of the
time the company wants to use WebEx instead.
I have tried WebEx a few
times but generally have had problems running it on my Macs even though they
claim to support Macs. So I use
that as an excuse to not try again.
In reality, even if WebEx worked perfectly every time I'd still be
reluctant to use it because of all of the software that it installs on my
machine - I donŐt like systems that do stealth installs of software over which
I have no control. Now WebEx has
announced that their new software will tell the meeting operator when the WebEx
software on the client is not in the foreground, for example when you are
checking your mail. That seals
it - no more WebEx for me.
I wonder if WebEx ever
even thought about psychological impact of their new feature. I can't see how they would not have
unless they are somehow used to their activities being monitored by people they
do not know.
disclaimer: I used to
work in Harvard's Psychology Department whose undergraduate concentrators would
understand the issues here better than WebEx seems to. But I did not consult any of them for
this column.