title: Postponing the
inevitable
by: Scott Bradner
Much to my surprise we are not yet paying taxes on whet we
buy over the Internet. Two years
ago when Congress passed a ban on new Internet-related taxes I fully expected
that by the time the ban expired, i.e., now) they would have figured out how to
levy taxes on on-line purchases and services. But, in a significant departure from normal congressional
practice, they have not done so.
Or, if they could not figure out a universal way to collect tax money
they would just let the old ban expire and state and local governments would go
hog wild figuring out how to do to the Internet what has been done to the phone
services, tax it almost to the point of pain. But, on November 16th Congress passed another 2-year
extension of the ban. (see http://Thomas.lcs.gov, search for HR 1552)
I am surprised at the lack of
taxes because figuring out how to tax things is part of "Being a
Congresscritter 101." And
because there has been so much pressure at the local level to enact or let them
enact Internet-related taxes.
There are occasional lapses where Congress reduces taxes. But those lapses are few and of short
duration. Maybe they reduce taxes
so that they get an opportunity to feel good when raising then again.
I do expect that the current
ban will not survive its two-year lifetime. I expect that Congress will come up with some way out of
their inability to formulate a taxing mechanism before then and new legislation
will be approved to correct the problem.
The above is more than a bit
facetious because it is somewhat illogical to have one, or actually two, ways
of doing business exempted from the normal tax-full society. There is something out of kilter if
your requirement to pay sales taxes depends on the method of purchase. There is no difference in concept
between buying a set of drills at the local hardware store or over the
net. You are exchanging money for
drills. Why should there be a
difference in taxes?
Note that this is not just an
Internet vs. physical store kind of thing. The same is true for mail-order catalogue companies where
you call them up to place the order.
Local authorities have tried to get these companies to pay taxes on the
sales to customers within the geographic scope of the local authority. The Supreme Court a few years ago said
that the requirement was fine but enforcing it was not, at least for companies
without a substantial presence in the local geographic scope. Congress will have to deal with both
cases in order to move forward.
But, facetiousness aside, I
do expect that Congress will figure out a way to keep the life-blood of
governments flowing even in the new world of the Internet since most
congresscritters have gone on to graduate school in the ways of revenue
raising.
disclaimer: Parts of Harvard may have helped in the
advanced degrees but I did not ask them their opinion on this issue.