The following text is copyright 1995 by
Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction, as long as
attribution is given and this notice is included.
Naughty Bits
By: Scott Bradner
There is now an attempt
among a wide group of people to try and come up with a technical solution to
one of the most vexing of the byproducts of this technical revolution that is
the Internet. The problem of giving the users of the Internet some level of control
over the type of material they or their children are exposed to.
The World Wide Web (WWW)
has developed into the major way of accessing information over the Internet
despite the fact that the web is not a specific thing. It is basically a way of
providing pointers to information accessible over the Internet, sort of like a
distributed TV Guide with no single publisher. The pointers are known as
Universal Resource Locators (URLs) An example URL is one that this newspaper
used to point to the text of a recent interview. (http://www.nww.com/ibmqa.html).
URLs currently include
three types of information. The first part (http:) indicates the type of
process or program that must be used to retrieve the data. The second part (www.nww.com)
is the name of the computer on the Internet where the information is stored.
The final part (ibmqa.hhtp) is the name of the file containing the information.
The web, as the WWW is
referred to, is not the only way that information is retrieved over the
Internet but it is the fastest growing method. Web traffic now makes up the
largest single type of traffic on the Internet comprising about a fifth of all
traffic, up from a few percent two years ago.
A number of people now
think that one could add additional information to the URLs, in particular, one
could add a new field that could be used to indicate something about the
content of the referenced file. Something along the lines of movie ratings one
sees in TV Guide. To be sure that someone does not setup a misleading URL the
same information would have to be added to the data files themselves . The
Monty Pithon term "naughty bits" does spring to mind when reading
about the idea.
Software that is used to
access the web could be configured to only retrieve information when the URL
included a naughty bits field and then only if the information indicated that
the information was suitable for the particular user. Parents could purchase
for their kids web brousers specifically programmed to only allow access to
specific types of information. Public libraries or schools where Internet
access is provided to the public could provide browsers with permissions based
on the age or preferences of the user.
Take a look at
ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/ draft-borenstein-kidcode-00.txt/ for one
example of what sort of thinking is going on. This proposal uses a tag that
include the age at which someone would be assumed to be able to deal with the
contents and a tag word or two listing the types of potentially objectionable
contents. (profanity, violence etc.)
There are a few
implementation details yet to be figured out. Creating software that pays
attention to such an information field s quite easy. It may not even be all
that hard to get service providers to add the information to the URLs. It is
rather more difficult to get some consistent understanding of what to put in
the field.
Evaluation of
information in this area is highly subjective. Something that I would find in
normal discourse in the (allegedly hallowed) halls of Harvard would be dull to
the extreme in many places and salacious in even more. Coming up with a set of
standard ways to evaluate material will not be easy. (Hopefully one can be
developed that can be distributed, unlike some of the congressional attempts at
defining pornography.)
Even with the problems
of subjectiveness and a potential for providers to purposely misrepresent the
contents of their materiel, approaches of this sort would seem to me to be far
preferable to the approaches which would result in making material unsuitable
for a 6 year old unavailable to all.
disclaimer: Although
everyone attending Harvard is above the age of 6 (at least physically) and thus
controlling access is less of an issue, Harvard has not addressed the issue and
the above reflect only my views.