The following text is copyright 1995 by
Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction, as long as
attribution is given and this notice is included.
Contraindications for
Fragmentation
By: Scott Bradner
From the unrealized
fears department. For a while it looked like just about every major company
thought they could do the Internet better than the Internet could do the
Internet. Ziff Davis, Apple and others announced grandiose plans for the
creation of private networks with national scope but only tenuous descriptions
of how they were going to interact with the existing Internet.
I wrote about the Ziff
Davis announcement a while back (NW 3/7/94 pp 13) and it turns out that the
problem was in the telling not in the planning. I have now been told that they
had plans from the start to be well connected to the rest of the Internet. I’ve
not been told what those plans are (or were, that part of the Ziff Davis
holdings was purchased by AT&T last year) but I’ve been assured that it was
only a glitch in the PR department that kept the truth from the world.
For quite a while it has
been known that Microsoft was going to do something with networks and on-line
services in conjunction with, or at least in temporal proximity to, Windows
'95. There was a great deal of speculation over what form these efforts would
take. In particular, there was a real worry that Microsoft would decide that it
was big enough to build its own international network which would compete with
the existing Internet.
This was not a totally
irrational fear. Many other big companies have felt that way in the past, with
the best example being IBM and SEARS with Prodigy. With projected sales of
Windows '95 in the tens of millions of copies and with the resources it has at
hand (now that it is not buying the Catholic Church), Microsoft would quickly
have the scale and reach of the existing Internet.
But last week’s
announcements by Microsoft and Uunet Technologies painted an entirely different
picture. There will be "The Microsoft Network" but it will use the expanding
Internet as its structure. It will not be a collection of entirely proprietary
applications running over a private network but instead it will be Mosaic
running over an integrated Internet. I would not be surprised if there were
some proprietary additional applications but the basic thrust seems to be that
Microsoft does not need to invent everything anew but can make use of existing
technology. Although it was not clear from the announcements, it appears that
Microsoft will deploy, or help get deployed, an array of new services on the
Internet and that it is this collection of services that will be "The
Microsoft Network".
The attitude of the
other big players seems to be changing. CompuServe and Prodigy started out
thinking that they could go it alone without dealing with the Internet. After
much prodding, and in some cases private gateways, they finally accepted the
idea of exchanging email with the Internet but did not think much of the idea
of actually supporting interactive applications. These and most of the other
services of this type are now rushing to figure out how to let their users
"surf the Internet." I expect that they are not doing this because of
some inner light but because they fear losing customers to competitors who do a
better job of putting their users on the Internet itself.
MCI is pushing its
InternetMCI service with millions of dollars of advertising, advertising which
is a lot clearer and more to the point than what they started with. Speaking of
advertising, I don’t know about you but selecting the name "Warp" for
an operating systems does not convey an image of maturity and stability to me.
It sounds more like an over sugared breakfast cereal. Well, IBM has now gone
from pop art to classical (from the ridiculous to the not quite sublime) with
its latest ads of old French men and Italian nuns talking about the marvels of
IBM technology including the lure of the Internet.
The common theme for all
of these is that the Internet is better, or at least more popular, than what a
company can do by itself, thus the fragmentation of future data services which
many feared is not in the current cards.
Disclaimer: Harvard,
like all users of the Internet, has an interest in seeing that future data
services be universal but these words express only my own opinions.